If you’re the kind of person who gets their knickers in a twist over people saying ‘Happy Holidays,’ instead of ‘Merry Christmas,’ then that’s your prerogative. Just don’t pretend to care about the Season of Goodwill.
If you won’t accept a greeting in the spirit in which it’s offered, and instead use it as a semantic excuse to get angry about something, then with all due respect, that’s not the way to Peace on Earth, my friend.
Merry Christmas, Happy Holidays, Happy New Year, whatever! It doesn’t matter. Just be happy for Christ’s sake.
I say all the above as a Catholic.
Happy Christmas.
21 December, 2013
19 December, 2013
Meet the Bottom of the Barrel
When Paul McCartney was asked around the time of The Beatles
Anthology albums if there was anything left in the vaults that might eventually
be released, he said that if they ever did, they would have to call it Scraping
the Bottom of the Barrel.
Well, we’re there. In fairness, Bootleg Recordings 1963 is not a
desperate attempt to find some product to release. It’s an open secret that
these recordings are being quietly released in order to extend their copyright.
Briefly, current copyright laws have recordings reverting to public domain
after 50 years but if they have been officially released, the owners can
squeeze another 20 years out of them.
Sony has already begun doing it with its Bob Dylan archives, even
going so far as to title the first volume, The Copyright Extension Collection.
However, whereas Sony released the Dylan tracks in ridiculously limited (as few
as 100) physical editions, The Beatles are doing it with a Wikileaks style file
dump. Fifty-nine tracks were released on iTunes yesterday with almost no
promotion.
The first quarter of the collection is outtakes from the recording
of the Please Please Me album and singles from 1963. Since these records were
made live in the studio, these takes are extremely similar to the released
versions. Some of them even sound a little better without the added reverb. The
tracks are mixed for stereo, the same as the album versions, with vocals and
rhythm guitar on the right, and drums, bass, lead guitar and vocal reverb on
the left. The sound quality is just as good as the remastered albums. Apart
from some studio talk and missing harmonica, if you told people these were the
album versions, all but the most expert fan would probably believe you.
Speaking of studio banter, there’s not much of it, so if you were
hoping to hear The Beatles working, you’ll be disappointed. It’s easy these
days to think The Beatles were always all-conquering but in 1963, they were
simply rising stars, barely out of their teens. They were rising quickly for sure, but this was before
they had the run of EMI studios to do whatever they wanted, so what we hear is
The Beatles on their best behaviour.
When On Air - Live at the BBC Volume 2 came out last month (a mere
19 years after Volume 1), some people asked why they don’t just release all the
BBC sessions. Well, be careful what you wish for, because most of the remainder
of this collection does just that – for 1963 at least. Forty two tracks from sixteen different sessions across six different programs.
The sound quality of these recordings is variable with songs from Saturday Club being particularly poor. It might have been possible to use some studio magic
to clean these up but listening pleasure is not really the point of this
release. Sometimes the quality varies wildly across the same program. It might
even come down to which particular shelf the BBC had the tape on. It’s all
perfectly listenable though and the recordings from the Pop Go The Beatles sessions
are quite good. It does, of course, add to the authenticity of recordings that
were meant to be heard on AM radio.
The sequencing of the BBC tracks is slightly odd. Rather than
playing all the songs from a particular program, they chop and change for no
apparent reason. The sessions from Pop Go The Beatles are all over the place,
yet these are followed by all the songs from the Side by Side program together.
I don’t think the collection would be any more or less repetitive (and it is repetitive - you won’t want another
Taste of Honey for some time) if they just played the programs in order. Then again, this being iTunes, you can just make yourself a playlist if you like.
The two concluding tracks are demo versions of Bad to Me and I’m in Love,
which were eventually recorded and released by Billy J Kramer with The Dakotas and
The Fourmost respectively. Bad to Me
is played by John and Paul on acoustic guitars; I’m in Love is John solo on piano.
The most notable tracks include Takes 1 and 2 of One After 909 (a song that was shelved until
the Let It Be album), I Saw Her Standing
There with just a whispered count-in, a slightly swinging version of Love Me Do from Saturday Club and A Shot of Rhythm and Blues from Pop Go
The Beatles.
So, should you buy it?
Well, everything about the way this ‘album’ was released suggests
neither Universal (and gee it feels weird to talk about The Beatles’ recordings being owned
by Universal and not EMI) nor the Beatles want you to.
It’s not even a fans-only release. If it were, it would at least have a digital
booklet with notes and explanations. This is just marking territory. They had
to release them in order to stop anyone else releasing them.
Musically, it’s nothing more than a collection of historic curios,
which is fine if you’re into that kind of thing, and there are millions of
Beatles fans who are. (Hello!) However, if you’re one of
them, you’d better get in quick. Now that it has been released, legal honour is
satisfied and they can pull it at any time, which is possibly why it has only
been released digitally and not physically.
The other consideration is the price. When I downloaded it yesterday
morning, it cost me $15.49, which is beyond reasonable, it was an absolute bargain. (I must thank my twitter friend Greg for the link, without
which I would have missed the cheap price. I owe you several beers some time,
mate!) Four hours later, it had disappeared from the
store and old links no longer worked, leading people around the world to
suspect that it had already been withdrawn from sale. Then today, it was back
in the iTunes store, for $69.99! (Check your local guides) No way is it worth
that much; certainly not without four CDs, comprehensive sleeve notes and an
elegant box. It’s just another reason to suspect they really don’t want anyone to buy this.
If the law doesn’t change, we can presumably expect one of these
collections every year and they will only get bigger as The Beatles’ career
exploded. However, next year we will be expecting it which means that
availability may be even briefer, so keep your eyes peeled next December.
Labels:
copyright,
music,
the Beatles
15 December, 2013
Shut up about Peppa!
One sentence was all it took. Just one sentence in an otherwise
predictable and formulaic rant against his competition and Piers Akerman
seemed to distract the whole internet...
I'll tell you the rest at AusOpinion.
I'll tell you the rest at AusOpinion.
07 December, 2013
What we have lost
Last night on the special edition of 7:30 on the passing of Nelson Mandela, Quentin Dempster asked Andrea Durbach, “What do we lose with Nelson Mandela’s death?”
It’s a powerful question and if I might offer an answer, part of what we lose is control over his words and what they mean.
There are certain icons of history; people who not even the most churlish of contrarians would disagree with. Nelson Mandela is certainly one of them, but what happens to those icons is that their words get co-opted and their messages corrupted by those who want only to be associated with them, not to embody them. From Jesus Christ to Martin Luther King, you don’t have to look far to find those who are happy to quote their words without any understanding of or empathy for their real meaning.
I have seen King’s speech about judging people not by the colour of their skin but by the content of their character actually used as an excuse for racism. Hey, we’re judging people by the content of their character and it’s a pure coincidence that the character we are judging just happens to belong exclusively to people with different skin colours.
As the messages of those who were once considered radicals finally, and rightly, become mainstream, there will be more and more privileged idiots who try to claim their struggle as their own, from Pete Hoekstra comparing the attempts to shut down Congress to the struggle for democracy in Iran, to Tony Abbott comparing his own time in opposition to that of Aung San Suu Kyi.
Already, it is happening to Mandela. Just last night, Rick Santorum compared the struggle against the great injustice of apartheid to his own struggle against the “great injustice” of Obamacare. I kid you not. I couldn’t make that up, and if I could, I wouldn’t.
I wouldn’t presume to know what Nelson Mandela would make of such a comparison but I doubt he would agree. Perhaps he would respond with a dry and playful irony similar to his response to the Spice Girls comparing his movement to their own phoney and confected “girl power,” which everyone would again take as an endorsement of their own assumptions, whatever they may be. Such was his wit.
The world loses much with his passing and no small part of it is his authority and perspective on what a struggle against injustice really is.
It’s a powerful question and if I might offer an answer, part of what we lose is control over his words and what they mean.
There are certain icons of history; people who not even the most churlish of contrarians would disagree with. Nelson Mandela is certainly one of them, but what happens to those icons is that their words get co-opted and their messages corrupted by those who want only to be associated with them, not to embody them. From Jesus Christ to Martin Luther King, you don’t have to look far to find those who are happy to quote their words without any understanding of or empathy for their real meaning.
I have seen King’s speech about judging people not by the colour of their skin but by the content of their character actually used as an excuse for racism. Hey, we’re judging people by the content of their character and it’s a pure coincidence that the character we are judging just happens to belong exclusively to people with different skin colours.
As the messages of those who were once considered radicals finally, and rightly, become mainstream, there will be more and more privileged idiots who try to claim their struggle as their own, from Pete Hoekstra comparing the attempts to shut down Congress to the struggle for democracy in Iran, to Tony Abbott comparing his own time in opposition to that of Aung San Suu Kyi.
Already, it is happening to Mandela. Just last night, Rick Santorum compared the struggle against the great injustice of apartheid to his own struggle against the “great injustice” of Obamacare. I kid you not. I couldn’t make that up, and if I could, I wouldn’t.
I wouldn’t presume to know what Nelson Mandela would make of such a comparison but I doubt he would agree. Perhaps he would respond with a dry and playful irony similar to his response to the Spice Girls comparing his movement to their own phoney and confected “girl power,” which everyone would again take as an endorsement of their own assumptions, whatever they may be. Such was his wit.
The world loses much with his passing and no small part of it is his authority and perspective on what a struggle against injustice really is.
01 December, 2013
The Bonus Discs: New
The US Target edition of New comes with a
bonus DVD called A Rendez-vous with Paul McCartney.
It’s a 22-minute interview, conducted by
Genevieve Borne, about the ‘Out There’ tour. It’s an odd inclusion, given that
the main part of the tour concluded before the album was released and didn’t
preview any songs from it.
As short tour films go, it’s
paint-by-numbers stuff, containing very little that long-term fans wouldn’t
already know. There’s a bit of discussion about previously unplayed songs
recently added to the setlist such as All Together Now and particularly Being for the Benefit of Mr Kite,
but we only hear snippets of the actual songs. The warmest moment is talking
about the plague of grasshoppers that invaded the stage in Brazil.
On the whole, it’s like an extra feature on a concert disc that was never released.
The packaging is no different to the
regular deluxe version (yes, there are regular, deluxe, and special deluxe
editions). The DVD comes in a cardboard sleeve with artwork identical to the
album cover, stuck with removable gum to the album packaging.
Audio: Dolby Stereo
Worth paying extra for? If you can find it at Target, it doesn’t cost any more and it’s certainly
worth having, but not worth going out of your way for or paying ebay prices. Look it up on YouTube instead.
Labels:
bonus discs,
DVD Reviews,
music,
Paul McCartney
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)